Lower-limb joint reaction forces and moments during modified cycling in healthy controls and individuals with knee osteoarthritis.

Autor: Thompson RL; Department of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Biomedical Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA. Electronic address: rthomp50@vols.utk.edu., Gardner JK; Department of Kinesiology and Health Science, Biola University, La Mirada, CA, USA., Zhang S; Department of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport Studies, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA., Reinbolt JA; Department of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Biomedical Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) [Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)] 2020 Jan; Vol. 71, pp. 167-175. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Nov 10.
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.11.004
Abstrakt: Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a clinical problem affecting an estimated 27 million adults in the United States, with the only clear treatment options being pain management. Cycling is an integral component of exercise for individuals with knee osteoarthritis, while the joint reaction forces during cycling remain unknown.
Methods: Thirteen subjects with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis and eleven healthy subjects performed a cycling protocol with a neutral pedal and four pedal modifications. Six hundred muscle-actuated inverse-dynamic simulations (24 subjects, 5 trials in each of 5 conditions) were performed to estimate joint reaction force differences between conditions.
Findings: Subjects with knee osteoarthritis had many significant changes among them was a reduction in knee adduction-abduction moment by 45% (5° lateral wedge), 77% (10° lateral wedge), 54% (5° toe-in) and 58% (10° toe-in). Conversely the healthy subjects had no significant changes in the knee adduction-abduction moment for the lateral wedge conditions and the 5° toe-in but did decrease by 18% for the 10° toe-in condition. When comparing the cohorts across the different pedal conditions, the data showed many significant differences among the groups.
Interpretation: This study showed that while cycling in different pedal modifications, the knee osteoarthritis subjects had more beneficial changes in their knee adduction-abduction moment compared to the healthy subjects with the lateral-wedge modification resulting in the greatest impact on the subjects with knee osteoarthritis. Both groups had greater contact forces at the hip and ankle across pedal modifications compared to neutral. For the knee, subjects with osteoarthritis mostly decreased their knee contact forces but the healthy subjects mostly increased these forces with all pedal modifications.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None of the authors had any conflict of interest regarding this manuscript.
(Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: