Quality Improvement Interventions to Improve Critical Congenital Heart Disease Screening.

Autor:	Hom LA; Children's National Heart Institute, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC., Chan Salcedo C; Division of Cardiology, Children's National Heart Institute, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC and The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC., Revenis M; Division of Neonatology, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC and The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC., Martin GR; Children's National Heart Institute, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC.; Division of Nursing Systems, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Pediatric quality & safety [Pediatr Qual Saf] 2019 Sep 26; Vol. 4 (5), pp. e221. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Sep 26 (Print Publication: 2019).
DOI:	10.1097/pq9.0000000000000221
Abstrakt:	Newborn screening for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) using pulse oximetry improves detection and is associated with decreased related infant mortality. In 2015, the Healthy Hearts of Babies Act required hospitals to screen all newborns in the District of Columbia for CCHD using pulse oximetry and to provide documentation of individual screening results to the Department of Health. A regulatory report from the electronic health record revealed an opportunity to improve both documentation and protocol adherence within our hospital. We aimed to reduce documentation errors and protocol violations by 75% and sustain this improvement for 6 months. Methods: In February of 2014, our center, a large free-standing children's hospital, implemented CCHD screening in the neonatal intensive care unit on all infants without known congenital heart disease or receiving supplemental oxygen. During the intervention period (January 2016 to December 2018), an interdisciplinary team engaged in regular review and analysis of reports, monthly closed-loop feedback, and iterative refinements to the electronic health record. Statistical process control charts were used to compare a baseline period to the intervention period and track monthly progress. Results: Between February 2014 and December 2018, we screened 2,214 infants for CCHD. The average percentage of documentation errors decreased from 23.5% during the baseline period to 1.2% during the intervention period, a sustained reduction for over 2 years. Protocol violations occurred at an average of 2.1% in the baseline period, with a sustained decrease to 0.6% during the intervention period. Conclusions: This multimodal quality improvement project demonstrated a sustained reduction of CCHD screening documentation errors and protocol violations. (Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu