The Validity, Reliability and Internal Consistency of the Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the FIL-DASH (Filipino Version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) Questionnaire in Patients with Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries.

Autor: Estrella EP; ASTRO (Advanced Study and Research in Orthopedics) Study Group, Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.; Section of Hand & Reconstructive Microsurgery, Department of Orthopedics, Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines., Orillaza NS Jr; ASTRO (Advanced Study and Research in Orthopedics) Study Group, Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.; Section of Hand & Reconstructive Microsurgery, Department of Orthopedics, Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines., Castillo-Carandang NT; ASTRO (Advanced Study and Research in Orthopedics) Study Group, Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines., Cordero CP; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines., Juban NR; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: The journal of hand surgery Asian-Pacific volume [J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol] 2019 Dec; Vol. 24 (4), pp. 456-461.
DOI: 10.1142/S2424835519500590
Abstrakt: Background: The objective of this paper was to determine the validity, reliability and internal consistency of the translated FILIPINO DASH (FIL-DASH) questionnaire in patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries. Methods: Thirty-five adult patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury were enrolled in the validation stage. The same questionnaire was given to the patient between 7 to 14 days for the test-retest reliability . The validated Filipino version of the SF-36 was used as the gold standard to determine the construct validity of the translated DASH. We also compared the DASH score with the SF-36 total and subscale, validated Brief Pain Inventory Severity and Interference Scale and the Visual Acuity Scale (VAS) for Pain. Results: The internal consistency was adequate, with Cronbach's Alpha for the 30 items of 0.93 and an average inter-item covariance of 0.399. The test-retest reliability was 0.87 ( p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in establising the validity of the translated DASH against SF-36 total and Subscale, validated Brief Pain Inventory Severity and Interference Scale and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Conclusions: The translated DASH (FIL-DASH) questionnaire was internally consistent and showed no difference in testing for test-retest reliability and validity against functional outcome measures and pain scales validated for adult Filipinos.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: