Change in staff perspectives on indwelling urinary catheter use after implementation of an intervention bundle in seven Swiss acute care hospitals: results of a before/after survey study.
Autor: | Niederhauser A; Swiss Patient Safety Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland niederhauser@patientensicherheit.ch., Züllig S; Swiss Patient Safety Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland., Marschall J; Swissnoso National Center for Infection Control, Bern, Switzerland.; Department of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland., Schweiger A; Swissnoso National Center for Infection Control, Bern, Switzerland.; Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland., John G; Department of Internal Medicine, Hopital neuchatelois, Neuchatel, Switzerland., Kuster SP; Swissnoso National Center for Infection Control, Bern, Switzerland.; Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland., Schwappach DL; Swiss Patient Safety Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland.; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2019 Oct 28; Vol. 9 (10), pp. e028740. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Oct 28. |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028740 |
Abstrakt: | Objective: To evaluate changes in staff perspectives towards indwelling urinary catheter (IUC) use after implementation of a 1-year quality improvement project. Design: Repeated cross-sectional survey at baseline (October 2016) and 12-month follow-up (October 2017). Setting: Seven acute care hospitals in Switzerland. Participants: The survey was targeted at all nursing and medical staff members working at the participating hospitals at the time of survey distribution. A total of 1579 staff members participated in the baseline survey (T Intervention: A multimodal intervention bundle, consisting of an evidence-based indication list, daily re-evaluation of ongoing catheter need and staff training, was implemented over the course of 9 months. Main Outcome Measures: Staff knowledge (15 items), perception of current practices and culture (scale 1-7), self-reported responsibilities (multiple-response question) and determinants of behaviour (scale 1-7) before and after implementation of the intervention bundle. Results: The mean number of correctly answered knowledge questions increased significantly between the two survey periods (T Conclusion: We found small but significant changes in staff perceptions after implementation of an evidence-based intervention bundle. Efforts now need to be targeted at sustaining and reinforcing these changes, so that restrictive use of IUCs becomes an integral part of the hospital culture. Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared. (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |