Costs Associated with the Treatment of Low Back Disorders: A Comparison of Surgeons and Physiatrists.

Autor: Standaert CJ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA., Li JW; Trinity Partners, LLC, Waltham, MA., Glassman SJ; Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH., Manolov NE; Dobson|DaVanzo and Associates, LLC, Vienna, VA., Thomas SA; Cleveland Clinic, Avon, OH., Lee AA; Synergy Rehabilitation and Wellness Center, Scottsdale, AR., Dolak MA; American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rosemont, IL., Stinneford MK; American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rosemont, IL.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation [PM R] 2020 Jun; Vol. 12 (6), pp. 551-562. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Dec 18.
DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12266
Abstrakt: Background: Spine care is costly and subject to wide variability. Defining costs and patterns of care for different specialties is critical to improving value.
Objective: Determine costs, utilization, and differences therein for nonoperative and operative specialists in treating low back disorders. We hypothesized costs associated with nonoperative specialists would be lower.
Design: Retrospective cohort.
Setting: Medicare Limited Data Set (5% sample), 2011 to 2014.
Participants: A total of 170 011 patients saw a primary care provider for a low back disorder between 1 July 2011, and 1 January 2013. Excluding those seen for a low back disorder in the preceding 6 months, final cohorts totaled 11 829 patients subsequently evaluated by a physiatrist (specialist in physical medicine and rehabilitation; 3183 patients) or surgeon (orthopedic or neurosurgeon; 8646 patients) within the following 6 months.
Main Outcome Measures: Total Medicare expenditures, spine-specific costs, spine surgical rates over 24 months.
Results: Cohorts had comparable demographics, initial diagnoses, and baseline mean per-member per-month (PMPM) total spending. Mean 2-year spine-specific spending was $3978 for the physiatrist cohort and $7387 for the surgeon cohort. Comparatively, the physiatrist cohort had lower total mean 2-year spine-specific spending (-$3409; 95% confidence interval [CI] -$3824 to -$2994), mean PMPM total spending (-$122/mo; CI -$184 to -$60), and surgical rate (7.8% vs. 18.9%, risk ratio [RR] = 0.41; CI 0.36-0.47). Surgery predominantly drove cost differential. Mean PMPM total spending for both cohorts remained elevated at 24 months compared to baseline mean spending (physiatrist: +$293; CI $447 to $138; surgeon: +$325; CI $425 to $225).
Conclusions: Following a new episode of a low back disorder, substantial costs were seen for those subsequently evaluated by a physiatrist or surgeon. Costs were considerably lower for those first seen by a physiatrist. Patients in both cohorts displayed long-term increases in health care costs. Our data suggest that early engagement in nonoperative care, when appropriate, may improve value.
(© 2019 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: