Exploring improvement plans of fourteen European integrated care sites for older people with complex needs.
Autor: | Stoop A; Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands; Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Scientific Center for Transformation in Care and Welfare (Tranzo), University of Tilburg, Tilburg, the Netherlands. Electronic address: annerieke.stoop@rivm.nl., de Bruin SR; Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands. Electronic address: simone.de.bruin@rivm.nl., Wistow G; Personal Social Services Research Unit, Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. Electronic address: G.Wistow@lse.ac.uk., Billings J; Centre for Health Service Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK. Electronic address: J.R.Billings@kent.ac.uk., Ruppe G; Austrian Interdisciplinary Platform on Ageing (ÖPIA), Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: ruppe@oepia.at., Leichsenring K; Austrian Interdisciplinary Platform on Ageing (ÖPIA), Vienna, Austria; European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: leichsenring@euro.centre.org., Obermann K; Mannheim Institute of Public Health (MIPH), Heidelberg University, Germany. Electronic address: konrad.obermann@medma.uni-heidelberg.de., Baan CA; Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands; Scientific Center for Transformation in Care and Welfare (Tranzo), University of Tilburg, Tilburg, the Netherlands. Electronic address: caroline.baan@rivm.nl., Nijpels G; Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: g.nijpels@amsterdamumc.nl. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) [Health Policy] 2019 Dec; Vol. 123 (12), pp. 1135-1154. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Sep 24. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.09.009 |
Abstrakt: | Integrated care programmes are increasingly being put in place to provide care to older people living at home. However, knowledge about further improving integrated care is limited. In fourteen integrated care sites in Europe, plans to improve existing ways of working were designed, implemented and evaluated to enlarge the understanding of what works and with what outcomes when improving integrated care. This paper provides insight into the existing ways that the sites were working with respect to integrated care, their perceived difficulties and their plans for working towards improvement. The seven components of the Expanded Chronic Care Model provided a conceptual framework for describing the fourteen sites. Although sites were spread across Europe and differed in basic characteristics and existing ways of working, a number of difficulties in delivering integrated care were similar. Existing ways of working and improvement plans mostly focused on three components of the Expanded Chronic Care Model: delivery system design; decision support; self-management. Two components were represented less frequently in existing ways of working and improvement plans: building healthy public policy; building community capacity. These findings suggest that broadly-based prevention efforts, population health promotion and community involvement remain limited. From the Expanded Chronic Care Model perspective, therefore, opportunities for improving integrated care outcomes may continue to be restricted by the narrow focus of developed improvement plans. (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |