"The White Version of Cheating?" Ethical and Social Equity Concerns of Cognitive Enhancing Drug Users in Higher Education.

Autor: Aikins R; University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education, 208 S. 37th Street, Rm 213, Philadelphia, PA, USA 19104, raikins@upenn.edu.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of academic ethics [J Acad Ethics] 2019 Jun; Vol. 17 (2), pp. 111-130. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Dec 11.
DOI: 10.1007/s10805-018-9320-7
Abstrakt: So-called cognitive enhancing drugs (CEDs) are relatively common in higher education, especially among students who are white, male, and attend highly selective institutions. Using qualitative data from a diverse sample of 32 students at an elite university, the present study aims to examine whether students perceive CED use to be advantageous, equitable, and fair. Participants were either medical or nonmedical users of CEDs-primarily ADHD stimulant medications such as Adderall. Data were first coded openly, then axially into themes, and finally arranged to respond to research aims around social and ethical concerns. Ethical perceptions and behavioral justifications varied by participants' personal use frequency, class standing, and perceived social norms surrounding CEDs. Among the salient themes to emerge was the belief that CED use is a lesser or more tenable form of cheating, that the vagueness and prevalence of ADHD justifies nonmedical use, and that above all, CEDs are advantageous. Some participants expressed concern about the advantageousness of CEDs when coupled with a perceived imbalance of their use among students from traditionally underrepresented backgrounds, with one calling it "the white version of cheating." Implications for cheating and drug use prevention are discussed, situating cognitive enhancement as an emerging ethical and social equity concern in higher education.
Competing Interests: *The author declares no conflicts of interest.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: