A comparison of European countries FBDG in the light of their contribution to tackle diet-related health inequalities.

Autor:	Carrillo-Álvarez E; Blanquerna School of Health Sciences, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain.; Global Research of Wellbeing-GRoW-Research Group, FCSB-URL, Barcelona, Spain., Boeckx H; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Thomas More University, Geel, Belgium., Penne T; Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium., Palma Linares I; Blanquerna School of Health Sciences, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain., Storms B; Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium., Goedemé T; Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.; Department of Social Policy and Intervention, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	European journal of public health [Eur J Public Health] 2020 Apr 01; Vol. 30 (2), pp. 346-353.
DOI:	10.1093/eurpub/ckz139
Abstrakt:	Background: The purpose of this article is to report on a comparative analysis of the official food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) that were applicable in 2015 in 25 EU Member States. We assess FBDG in relation to the main guidelines established by the FAO/WHO, the EURODIET project and the EFSA, with a particular focus on identifying strengths and limitations of current FBDG in Europe towards addressing diet-related health inequalities. Methods: This is a review research, in which a mixed-methods sequenced procedure was utilized. In each EU country key informants, including sociologists, economists, dietitians and nutritionists were asked to provide data regarding: (i) current dietary guidelines and national health priorities, (ii) model of health promotion currently available, (iii) results of the latest food consumption survey. All documents were reviewed by the coordinating team. Full data were analysed by two nutritionists, using a tabulated sheet to organize and compare the results. Results: While all countries have national FBDG, the level of detail and quality varies substantially with regard to: time of last update; availability of recommendations for specific target groups; specification of frequency and portion size; the graphical representation; recommended amounts and limits of foods consumed; and recommendations regarding physical activity. Conclusions: European countries have great opportunities to improve FBDG to better serve Public Health policy through a more consistent foundation of how these guidelines are developed, the inclusion of different population subgroups as a target for recommendations and the implementation of monitoring systems. (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu