Increased mortality and ICD therapies in ischemic versus non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy patients with cardiac resynchronization having survived until first device replacement.

Autor: Beiert T; Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Bonn, Germany., Straesser S; Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Bonn, Germany., Malotki R; Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Bonn, Germany., Stöckigt F; Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Bonn, Germany., Schrickel JW; Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Bonn, Germany., Andrié RP; Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms University, Bonn, Germany.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Archives of medical science : AMS [Arch Med Sci] 2019 Jul; Vol. 15 (4), pp. 845-856. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Apr 16.
DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2018.75139
Abstrakt: Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy combined with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (CRT-D) is widely applied in heart failure patients. Sufficient data on arrhythmia and defibrillator therapies during long-term follow-up of more than 4 years are lacking and data on mortality are conflicting. We aimed to characterize the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia, respective defibrillator therapies and mortality for several years following CRT-D implantation or upgrade.
Material and Methods: Eighty-eight patients with ischemic (ICM) or non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and at least one CRT-D replacement were included in this study and analyzed for incidence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), defibrillator shocks, anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) and mortality.
Results: ICM was the underlying disease in 59%, DCM in 41% of patients. During a mean follow-up of 76.4 ±24.8 months the incidence of appropriate defibrillator therapies (shock or ATP) was 46.6% and was elevated in ICM compared to DCM patients (57.7% vs. 30.6%, respectively; p = 0.017). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly higher ICD therapy-free survival rates in DCM patients ( p = 0.031). Left ventricular ejection fraction, NSVT per year and ICM (vs. DCM) were independent predictors of device intervention. The ICM patients showed increased mortality compared to DCM patients, with cumulative all-cause mortality at 9 years of follow-up of 45.4% and 10.6%, respectively. Chronic renal failure, peripheral artery disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were independent predictors of mortality.
Conclusions: The clinical course of patients with ICM and DCM treated with CRT-D differs significantly during long-term follow-up, with increased mortality and incidence of ICD therapies in ICM patients.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Databáze: MEDLINE