| Autor: |
Starodubov VI; Federal Research Institute for Health Organization and Informatics of Ministry of Health of the Russia, Moscow, Russia., Kurakov FA; Center for Scientific and Technical Expertise, Institute of Applied Economic Research, the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia., Kurakova NG; Center for Scientific and Technical Expertise, Institute of Applied Economic Research, the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia., Tsvetkova LA; Center for Scientific and Technical Expertise, Institute of Applied Economic Research, the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia., Polyakova YV; B.V. Petrovsky National Russian Research Center for Surgery, Moscow, Russia. |
| Abstrakt: |
The purpose of the present research was to analyze the validity of the choice for biomedical disciplines fixed by the passport of the national project 'Science' for the following priority of the Strategy for the scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation: 'the transition to personalized medicine, high-tech medical care and health saving technologies ...'. We assessed the degree of relevance of this choice to great challenges facing the Russian Federation, as well as trends in the development of global biomedicine. The hypothesis of this study was the assumption that when determining priority areas it is necessary to proceed from the analysis and comparison of two arrays: the list of nosologies which account for the maximum morbidity, mortality, disability level of, primarily, the able-bodied population of Russia, and scientometric data identifying trends in the development of global biomedicine. |
