What is the impact of user affect on motor learning in virtual environments after stroke? A scoping review.
Autor: | Rohrbach N; Chair of Human Movement Science, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany., Chicklis E; Department of Physical Therapy, Movement & Rehabilitation Science, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA., Levac DE; Department of Physical Therapy, Movement & Rehabilitation Science, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA. d.levac@northeastern.edu. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation [J Neuroeng Rehabil] 2019 Jun 27; Vol. 16 (1), pp. 79. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jun 27. |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12984-019-0546-4 |
Abstrakt: | Purpose: The purported affective impact of virtual reality (VR) and active video gaming (AVG) systems is a key marketing strategy underlying their use in stroke rehabilitation, yet little is known as to how affective constructs are measured or linked to intervention outcomes. The purpose of this scoping review is to 1) explore how motivation, enjoyment, engagement, immersion and presence are measured or described in VR/AVG interventions for patients with stroke; 2) identify directional relationships between these constructs; and 3) evaluate their impact on motor learning outcomes. Methods: A literature search was undertaken of VR/AVG interventional studies for adults post-stroke published in Medline, PEDro and CINAHL databases between 2007 and 2017. Following screening, reviewers used an iterative charting framework to extract data about construct measurement and description. A numerical and thematic analytical approach adhered to established scoping review guidelines. Results: One hundred fifty-five studies were included in the review. Although the majority (89%; N = 138) of studies described at least one of the five constructs within their text, construct measurement took place in only 32% (N = 50) of studies. The most frequently described construct was motivation (79%, N = 123) while the most frequently measured construct was enjoyment (27%, N = 42). A summative content analysis of the 50 studies in which a construct was measured revealed that constructs were described either as a rationale for the use of VR/AVGs in rehabilitation (76%, N = 38) or as an explanation for intervention results (56%, N = 29). 38 (76%) of the studies proposed relational links between two or more constructs and/or between any construct and motor learning. No study used statistical analyses to examine these links. Conclusions: Results indicate a clear discrepancy between the theoretical importance of affective constructs within VR/AVG interventions and actual construct measurement. Standardized terminology and outcome measures are required to better understand how enjoyment, engagement, motivation, immersion and presence contribute individually or in interaction to VR/AVG intervention effectiveness. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |