Prognostic markers in salivary gland cancer and their impact on survival.
Autor: | Szewczyk M; Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Greater Poland Cancer Center, Poznan, Poland., Marszałek A; Department of Cancer Pathology and Prophylaxis, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Greater Poland Cancer Center, Poznan, Poland., Sygut J; Department of Cancer Pathology and Prophylaxis, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Greater Poland Cancer Center, Poznan, Poland., Golusiński P; Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Greater Poland Cancer Center, Poznan, Poland.; Department of Otolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Zielona Gora, Zielona Góra, Poland.; Department of Biology and Environmental Studies, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland., Golusiński W; Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Greater Poland Cancer Center, Poznan, Poland. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Head & neck [Head Neck] 2019 Sep; Vol. 41 (9), pp. 3338-3347. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jun 27. |
DOI: | 10.1002/hed.25857 |
Abstrakt: | Background: The role of molecular markers in salivary gland carcinoma (SGC) is not well understood. We evaluated molecular marker expression and their prognostic value. Methods: Immunohistochemical analysis of 124 tumor specimens was performed to determine expression of androgen (AR), estrogen (ER), and progesterone (PR) receptors and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), programmed death ligand 1 receptor (PD-L1), and PD-L1 in tumor-infiltrating mononuclear cell (TIMC). Survival outcomes (disease-free survival [DFS] and overall survival [OS]), pT and N classification, margin status, and treatment failure were assessed. Results: Most patients (78; 62.9%) had early-stage SGC. AR positivity and EGFR positivity were detected in 21.0% and 78.6%, respectively, of tumors. AR positivity and PD-L1 negativity were associated with locally advanced disease. PD-L1-negativity was associated with higher recurrence (38.5% vs 0%; P < .001) and worse DFS. OS and DFS were worse in patients with AR+ or HER2+ disease. Conclusions: Several molecular markers-AR and HER2 positivity and PD-L1 negativity-were associated with worse clinical outcomes. Prospective, multi-institutional trials are needed to determine the prognostic value of these markers. (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |