Efficacy of Resin Infiltrate in Noncavitated Proximal Carious Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Autor:	Elrashid AH; Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia., Alshaiji BS; Department of Dental Internship, College of Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia., Saleh SA; Department of Dental Internship, College of Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia., Zada KA; Department of Dental Internship, College of Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia., Baseer MA; Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry [J Int Soc Prev Community Dent] 2019 May-Jun; Vol. 9 (3), pp. 211-218. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jun 07.
DOI:	10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_26_19
Abstrakt:	Objectives: Resin infiltration is a minimally invasive technique for treating noncavitated proximal caries. It slows/stops the carious lesion progression rate by creating a diffusion barrier inside the porous enamel lesion body. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of resin infiltration on noncavitated proximal carious lesions in primary and permanent teeth. Materials and Methods: The records were obtained using electronic and other sources. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed to ensure transparent reporting. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of resin infiltration for noncavitated proximal carious lesions by comparing it with control/placebo. Each included study was assessed concerning the "risk of bias" using the Cochrane Collaboration's "risk-of-bias" assessment tool. High risk-of-bias studies were excluded from the meta-analyses due to selective reporting matters. The statistics were performed by RevMan software (The Cochrane Collaboration, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark) utilizing the random effect model. The GRADE approach was implemented for assessing the quality of evidence. Results: From 106 studies identified, 17 were assessed for eligibility. After "risk-of-bias" assessment, two meta-analyses were conducted to eliminate the limitation of the significant heterogeneity between trials inspecting primary teeth ( n = 2) and permanent teeth ( n = 3). I 2 = 0% indicates the absence of statistical heterogeneity. The risk of carious lesions' progression with resin infiltration was significantly lower in primary (risk ratio [RR]; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48; 0.30-0.75, P = 0.001) and in permanent teeth (RR; 95% CI: 0.19; 0.11-0.33, P < 0.00001) compared to that of control/placebo. The GRADE approach revealed high quality of evidence. Conclusion: The available evidence conveys high confidence that proximal resin infiltration has superior efficacy in slowing/arresting the carious lesions' progression rate in comparison to conventional management modalities. Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu