| Autor: |
Keung W; Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. wkeung@email.arizona.edu., Hagen TA; Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA., Wilson RC; Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.; Cognitive Science Program, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Nature human behaviour [Nat Hum Behav] 2019 Jun; Vol. 3 (6), pp. 636-645. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Mar 11. |
| DOI: |
10.1038/s41562-019-0551-4 |
| Abstrakt: |
Effective decision-making requires integrating evidence over time. For simple perceptual decisions, previous work suggests that humans and animals can integrate evidence over time, but not optimally. This suboptimality could arise from sources including neuronal noise, weighting evidence unequally over time (that is, the 'integration kernel'), previous trial effects and an overall bias. Here, using an auditory evidence accumulation task in humans, we report that people exhibit all four suboptimalities, some of which covary across the population. Pupillometry shows that only noise and the integration kernel are related to the change in pupil response. Moreover, these two different suboptimalities were related to different aspects of the pupil signal, with the individual differences in pupil response associated with individual differences in the integration kernel, while trial-by-trial fluctuations in pupil response were associated with trial-by-trial fluctuations in noise. These results suggest that different suboptimalities relate to distinct pupil-linked processes, possibly related to tonic and phasic norepinephrine activity. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink