The Fatigue and Fitness Test for Teams (FFITT): A practical option for monitoring athletes in a team as individuals.

Autor: Starling LT; Division of Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Sport Science Institute of South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa., Nellemann S; Division of Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Sport Science Institute of South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa., Parkes A; Division of Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Sport Science Institute of South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa., Lambert MI; Division of Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Sport Science Institute of South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: European journal of sport science [Eur J Sport Sci] 2020 Feb; Vol. 20 (1), pp. 106-114. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 May 20.
DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2019.1612951
Abstrakt: We developed the Fatigue and Fitness Test for Teams (FFITT ) to address the challenges of monitoring players in a team simultaneously. The test, which takes 8 min for the entire team, incorporates subjective measures of well-being (RTT-Q), and objective measures of the autonomic system (HRR 60s ) and neuromuscular function (SLJ). The aim of this study was to present the rationale for the FFITT as a novel athlete monitoring protocol and to measure the reliability of each component of the test. The internal consistency of the RTT-Q questions ranged from α = 0.69-0.92. All questions had an α > 0.83, with one exception of question ' Rate the well-being/stress your school/university/work is causing you to feel' which had an α = 0.69. The reliability of the HRR 60s and SLJ was high (R = 0.92, and 0.91 respectively). The absolute typical error of measurement (TEM) of the SLJ was 8 cm and HRR 60s was 3 beats. When expressed relatively the CV TEM of HRR 60s was 8.4% and SLJ was 3.0%. Based on the TEM the HRR 60s and SLJ could detect medium and large changes in fatigue and fitness. In absolute terms this equates to more than 5 bpm (HRR 60s ) and more than 13 cm (SLJ). The FFITT has the potential to satisfy both scientific principles and the coach's demands of a practical monitoring protocol for frequent use in a team.
Databáze: MEDLINE