Poor Agreement Between Two Commonly Used Measures of Shame- and Guilt-Proneness.

Autor: Eterović M; Department of Psychiatry, Referral Centre for Stress Related Disorders of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Croatia, University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia., Medved V; Department of Psychiatry, University of Zagreb Medical School University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia., Bilić V; Department of Psychiatry, University of Zagreb Medical School University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia., Kozarić-Kovačić D; Department for Forensic Sciences, University of Split, Split, Croatia., Žarković N; LabOs, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia, and University for Applied Sciences Baltazar, Zaprešić, Croatia.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of personality assessment [J Pers Assess] 2020 Jul-Aug; Vol. 102 (4), pp. 499-507. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Apr 23.
DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1585361
Abstrakt: This study sought to assess the agreement between commonly used measures of shame- and guilt-proneness, the Test of Self-Conscious Affect-3 (TOSCA-3), representing scenario measures, and the Personal Feelings Questionnaire-2 (PFQ-2), representing checklist measures. To overcome the limitations of the widely used correlation analysis, the 2 measures were compared by the Bland-Altman method. We administered both measures at once to the same sample of 138 graduate students (67.39% were female; median age = 27 years). A randomly selected sample of 46 students repeated the procedure 8 weeks later. We tested how well our data fit the hypothesized measurement models, analyzed internal consistency of measures, evaluated their repeatability, and analyzed the agreement between them. To account for the different ranges, both measures' scores were expressed as the percentages of their maxima. The observed data fit the proposed models well. Both measures showed good internal consistency and repeatability. In the shame domain, TOSCA-3 exceeded PFQ-2 scores by 22.32% on average (49.81, -5.13%; 95% limits of agreement), and even more in the guilt domain, by 38.4% (67.75, 8.20%). Our results question the often-assumed congruence of the shame domains assessed by scenario and checklist measures.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje