| Autor: |
Stahl BC; Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom., Akintoye S; Leicester De Montfort Law School, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom., Fothergill BT; Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom., Guerrero M; Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.; Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.; Department of Bioethics and Medical Humanities, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile., Knight W; Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom., Ulnicane I; Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom. |
| Abstrakt: |
The increasing use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) to help facilitate neuroscience adds a new level of complexity to the question of how ethical issues of such research can be identified and addressed. Current research ethics practice, based on ethics reviews by institutional review boards (IRB) and underpinned by ethical principlism, has been widely criticized. In this article, we develop an alternative way of approaching ethics in neuro-ICT research, based on discourse ethics, which implements Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) through dialogues. We draw on our work in Ethics Support, using the Human Brain Project (HBP) as empirical evidence of the viability of this approach. |
