Reporting quality in systematic reviews of in vitro studies: a systematic review.

Autor: Elshafay A; Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.; Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org/)., Omran ES; Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org/).; Kasralainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt., Abdelkhalek M; Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org/).; Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt., El-Badry MO; Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.; Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org/)., Eisa HG; Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org/).; Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Kom, Egypt., Fala SY; Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org/).; Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt., Dang T; Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org/).; Surgery Department School of Medicine, Tan Tao University, Tan Duc Ecity, Vietnam., Ghanem MAT; Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org/).; Department of Vascular Surgery, Uniklinik Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany., Elbadawy M; Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org/).; Ministry of Health, Cairo, Egypt., Elhady MT; Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org/).; Department of Pediatrics, Zagazig University Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine, Sharkia, Egypt., Vuong NL; Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org/).; Department of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Faculty of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam., Hirayama K; Department of Immunogenetics, Institute of Tropical Medicine (NEKKEN), Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan., Huy NT; Evidence Based Medicine Research Group & Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.; Department of Clinical Product Development, Institute of Tropical Medicine (NEKKEN), School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Current medical research and opinion [Curr Med Res Opin] 2019 Sep; Vol. 35 (9), pp. 1631-1641. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 May 28.
DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1607270
Abstrakt: Background: Systematic reviews (SRs) and/or meta-analyses of in vitro research have an important role in establishing the foundation for clinical studies. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the reporting quality of SRs of in vitro studies using the PRISMA checklist. Method: Four databases were searched including PubMed, Virtual Health Library (VHL), Web of Science (ISI) and Scopus. The search was limited from 2006 to 2016 to include all SRs and/or meta-analyses (MAs) of pure in vitro studies. The evaluation of reporting quality was done using the PRISMA checklist. Results: Out of 7702 search results, 65 SRs were included and evaluated with the PRISMA checklist. Overall, the mean overall quality score of reported items of the PRISMA checklist was 68%. We have noticed an increasing pattern in the numbers of published SRs of in vitro studies over the last 10 years. In contrast, the reporting quality was not significantly improved over the same period ( p  = .363). There was a positive but not significant correlation between the overall quality score and the journal impact factor of the included studies. Conclusions: The adherence of SRs of in vitro studies to the PRISMA guidelines was poor. Therefore, we believe that using reporting guidelines and journals paying attention to this fact will improve the quality of SRs of in vitro studies.
Databáze: MEDLINE