| Autor: |
Francis EA; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 3B2, Canada. elizabethann.francis@mail.utoronto.ca., Moldowan PD; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 3B2, Canada., Greischar MA; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 3B2, Canada., Rollinson N; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 3B2, Canada. |
| Abstrakt: |
Oviposition site choice affects a host of offspring phenotypes and directly impacts maternal fitness. Recent evidence suggests that oviparous reptiles often select nest sites where the landscape has been altered by anthropogenic activity, whereas natural nest sites are less often used. We leverage a long-term study of snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) to identify natural nest sites and anthropogenic nest sites and to compare habitat variables among nest site types. Natural and anthropogenic nest sites did not differ in average canopy closure, distance to nearest water, substrate composition, or aspect. However, anthropogenic nest sites had less ground-level vegetation and greater soil brightness, and were 3.3 °C warmer than natural nests during incubation. We used the Schoolfield model of poikilotherm development to assess differences in development rate between natural and anthropogenic nests. Because of the difference in temperature, embryos in anthropogenic nests were predicted to have undergone nearly twice as much development as embryos in natural nests during incubation. We outline why the evolution of fast embryonic development rate cannot compensate indefinitely for the low temperature incubation regimes that become increasingly prevalent at northern range margins, thereby underlining why maternal nest site choice of relatively warm anthropogenic sites may help oviparous reptiles persist in thermally constrained environments. Future research should aim to quantify both the thermal benefits of anthropogenic nest sites, as well as associated fitness costs (e.g., increased adult mortality) to elucidate whether anthropogenic disturbance of the landscape can be an ecological trap or serve a net benefit to some reptiles in northern environments. |
Full text from SpringerLink