[Improving the quality of supervision of residents: an evaluation of supervisors using feedback by residents].
| Autor: | Fluit CRMG, Klaassen TPFM, Sander L, de Visser-Oomen M, van den Hurk MM |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | Dutch; Flemish |
| Zdroj: | Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie [Tijdschr Psychiatr] 2019; Vol. 61 (3), pp. 182-187. |
| Abstrakt: | Background: To evaluate the quality of the supervision of residents, questionnaires are frequently used. AIM: Changes in resident ratings were assessed using the validated Evaluation and Feedback for Effective Clinical Teaching (effect) questionnaire. METHOD: Supervisors (n=89) of nine medical specialities were evaluated using a validated instrument (effect). Mean overall scores (mos) and mean scale scores were compared using paired t-tests. Ten supervisors were interviewed to determine factors that stimulate or hinder improvement after an evaluation. RESULTS: The strongest increase was seen in supervisors with an mos <4.0. Motivation to improve and dialogue about the feedback stimulated improvement. Lack of time and support hindered improvement. CONCLUSION: Evaluating supervisors by providing feedback and a dialogue is suitable to improve their supervision of residents. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|