| Autor: |
Tirelli G; a ENT Clinic, Head and Neck Department , University of Trieste , Trieste , Italy., Gardenal N; a ENT Clinic, Head and Neck Department , University of Trieste , Trieste , Italy., Gatto A; a ENT Clinic, Head and Neck Department , University of Trieste , Trieste , Italy., Bonini P; a ENT Clinic, Head and Neck Department , University of Trieste , Trieste , Italy., Tofanelli M; a ENT Clinic, Head and Neck Department , University of Trieste , Trieste , Italy., Fernández-Fernández MM; b Department of Otolaryngology , Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón , Madrid , Spain. |
| Abstrakt: |
Introduction: Minimally invasive surgery for laryngeal cancer is nowadays the goal of all larynx surgeons. Transoral laser microsurgery is a widespread and standardized technique that has made it possible to reduce surgical morbidities and hospitalization and to spare laryngeal function. Nonetheless, it has some limitations, which may be exceeded by using new optical and cutting devices as in TransOral UltraSonic Surgery. Areas covered: The aim of this paper is to identify current knowledge about ultrasonic scalpel (US) application in transoral laryngeal surgery and to deduce reasonable indications and contraindications of the tool. Expert opinion: Transoral laryngeal surgery with US is feasible and allows for 'angulated' dissections with higher hemostatic capacity than the CO 2 laser. When coupled with an endoscope, surgeons have the possibility to angulate the laryngeal exposure from the inside, reducing blind areas. Nonetheless, US blades are quite bulky, thermal damage is higher than that produced by CO 2 laser, and its use should be avoided where the functional result is more closely related to the amount of resected tissue. Tumors limited to the suprahyoid larynx are the current indications for US surgery. |
