A matched cohort examination of publication rates among clinical subspecialty fellows enrolled in a translational science training program.

Autor:	Ehlers SL; Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA., Cornelius KE; Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Rochester, MN, USA., Greenberg-Worisek AJ; Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Rochester, MN, USA., Warner DO; Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA., Weavers KM; Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Rochester, MN, USA., Thomson KR; Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Rochester, MN, USA., Hansen MJ; Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Rochester, MN, USA., Larson JJ; Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA., Enders FT; Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA., Iyer PG; Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of clinical and translational science [J Clin Transl Sci] 2018 Oct; Vol. 2 (5), pp. 327-333.
DOI:	10.1017/cts.2018.336
Abstrakt:	Purpose: This study examined the effectiveness of a formal postdoctoral education program designed to teach skills in clinical and translational science, using scholar publication rates as a measure of research productivity. Method: Participants included 70 clinical fellows who were admitted to a master's or certificate training program in clinical and translational science from 1999 to 2015 and 70 matched control peers. The primary outcomes were the number of publications 5 years post-fellowship matriculation and time to publishing 15 peer-reviewed manuscripts post-matriculation. Results: Clinical and translational science program graduates published significantly more peer-reviewed manuscripts at 5 years post-matriculation (median 8 vs 5, p =0.041) and had a faster time to publication of 15 peer-reviewed manuscripts (matched hazard ratio = 2.91, p =0.002). Additionally, program graduates' publications yielded a significantly higher average H-index (11 vs. 7, p =0.013). Conclusion: These findings support the effectiveness of formal training programs in clinical and translational science by increasing academic productivity.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu