Building a framework for the evaluation of knowledge translation for the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies.

Autor: Sketris IS; Faculty of Health Professions, College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada., Carter N; REAL Evaluation Services, Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation, Halifax, Canada., Traynor RL; Department of Community Health & Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada., Watts D; REAL Evaluation Services, Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation, Halifax, Canada., Kelly K; Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety [Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf] 2020 Jan; Vol. 29 Suppl 1, pp. 8-25. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Feb 20.
DOI: 10.1002/pds.4738
Abstrakt: Purpose: The Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES), a network of pharmacoepidemiologists and other researchers from seven provincial sites, provides evidence on the benefits and risks of drugs used by Canadians. The Knowledge Translation Team, one of CNODES' four main teams, evaluates the impact of its efforts using an iterative and emergent approach. This article shares key lessons from early evaluation phases, including identifying stakeholders and their evaluation needs, choosing evaluation theories and approaches, and developing evaluation questions, designs, and methods appropriate for the CNODES context.
Methods: Stakeholder analysis was conducted using documentary analysis to determine key contextual factors and research evidence needs of decision maker partners and other stakeholders. Selected theories and frameworks from the evaluation and knowledge translation literature informed decisions about evaluation design and implementation. A developmental approach to evaluation was deemed appropriate due to the innovative, complex, and ever-changing context.
Results: A theory of change, logic model, and potential evaluation questions were developed, informed by the stakeholder analysis. Early indicators of program impact (citation metrics, alternative metrics) have been documented; efforts to collect data on additional indicators are ongoing.
Conclusion: A flexible, iterative, and emergent evaluation approach allows the Knowledge Translation Team to apply lessons learned from completed projects to ongoing research projects, adapt its approaches based on stakeholder needs, document successes, and be accountable to funders/stakeholders. This evaluation approach may be useful for other international pharmacoepidemiology research networks planning and implementing evaluations of similarly complex, multistakeholder initiatives that are subject to constant change.
(© 2019 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: