Purple Dragons and Yellow Toadstools a Versatile Exercise for Introducing Students to Negotiated Consensus.

Autor: Coppola BP; Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. bcoppola@umich.edu., Plough IC; Residential College in the Arts and Humanities, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48825, USA., Sun H; Department of Chemistry, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Minhang District, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Science and engineering ethics [Sci Eng Ethics] 2019 Aug; Vol. 25 (4), pp. 1261-1269. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Feb 06.
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-019-00088-1
Abstrakt: An activity called Purple Dragons and Yellow Toadstools, originally reported in 1987 as a training activity for jurors, was adapted as a priming exercise for a unit on teaching research ethics with undergraduate students. In this activity, learners develop skills for building negotiated consensus. The procedure involves individuals' ranking 10-15 moral transgressions and/or legal violations followed by a small group discussion in order to arrive at an agreed-upon ranking by the team. The framework has proved to be quite flexible, adaptable to different subject areas and with different populations of students.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje