Stark effect or coverage dependence? Disentangling the EC-SEIRAS vibrational shift of sulfate on Au(111).

Autor: Pfisterer JHK; Molecular Spectroscopy Department, Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany., Zhumaev UE; Molecular Spectroscopy Department, Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany., Cheuquepan W; Instituto de Electroquímica, Universidad de Alicante, Apdo. 99, 03080 Alicante, Spain., Feliu JM; Instituto de Electroquímica, Universidad de Alicante, Apdo. 99, 03080 Alicante, Spain., Domke KF; Molecular Spectroscopy Department, Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: The Journal of chemical physics [J Chem Phys] 2019 Jan 28; Vol. 150 (4), pp. 041709.
DOI: 10.1063/1.5047941
Abstrakt: Infrared spectroscopy is a widely employed analytical tool in (electrochemical) surface science as the spectra contain a wealth of information about the interaction of interfacial adsorbates with their environment. Separating and quantifying individual contributions, for example, of co-adsorbates, the substrate or electric field effects, on the overall spectral response, however, is often non-trivial as the various interactions manifest themselves in similar spectral behavior. Here, we present an experimental approach to differentiate between and quantify potential-induced coverage dependence and field-related Stark effects observed in a sulfate band shift of 93.5 ± 1.5 cm -1 /V in electrochemical infrared spectra of the showcase sulfate/Au(111) interface. In combination with a simple linear model equation used to describe the potential-induced peak shift of the sulfate stretch vibration, we determine the coverage dependence contribution to be 15.6 ± 1.2 cm -1SO and the Stark effect to amount to 75.6 ± 2.7 cm -1 /V. Our work provides a novel route to gain fundamental insight into interfacial adsorbate interactions in electrochemical surface science.
Databáze: MEDLINE