Comparative evaluation of group-based mindfulness-based stress reduction and cognitive behavioural therapy for the treatment and management of chronic pain: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Autor:	Khoo EL; Clinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.; School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada., Small R; Clinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.; Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada., Cheng W; Clinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada., Hatchard T; School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada., Glynn B; Clinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada., Rice DB; Clinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.; Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada., Skidmore B; Independent Information Specialist Consultant, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada., Kenny S; Clinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.; Department of Educational & Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada., Hutton B; Clinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada., Poulin PA; Clinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.; Department of Psychology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Evidence-based mental health [Evid Based Ment Health] 2019 Feb; Vol. 22 (1), pp. 26-35.
DOI:	10.1136/ebmental-2018-300062
Abstrakt:	Question: This review compares mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) to cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) in its ability to improve physical functioning and reduce pain intensity and distress in patients with chronic pain (CP), when evaluated against control conditions. Study Selection and Analysis: Ovid MEDLINE, EmbaseClassic+Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify randomised controlled trials. The primary outcome measure was physical functioning. Secondary outcomes were pain intensity and depression symptoms. We used random and fixed effects (RE and FE) network meta-analyses (NMA) to compare MBSR, CBT and control interventions on the standardised mean difference scale. Findings: Twenty-one studies were included: 13 CBT vs control (n=1095), 7 MBSR vs control (n=545) and 1 MBSR vs CBT vs control (n=341). Of the 21 articles, 12 were determined to be of fair or good quality. Findings from RE NMA for change in physical functioning, pain intensity and depression revealed clinically important advantages relative to control for MBSR and CBT, but no evidence of an important difference between MBSR and CBT was found. Conclusions: This review suggests that MBSR offers another potentially helpful intervention for CP management. Additional research using consistent measures is required to guide decisions about providing CBT or MBSR. Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared. (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu