A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study Assessing Electroacupuncture for the Management of Postoperative Pain after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Autor:	Capodice JL; 1 Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York., Parkhomenko E; 1 Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York., Tran TY; 1 Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York., Thai J; 1 Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York., Blum KA; 1 Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York., Chandhoke RA; 1 Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York., Gupta M; 1 Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of endourology [J Endourol] 2019 Mar; Vol. 33 (3), pp. 194-200.
DOI:	10.1089/end.2018.0665
Abstrakt:	Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard procedure for large renal calculi but postoperative (PO) pain remains a concern. Modifications of the PCNL technique and intraoperative and PO strategies have been tested to reduce pain. PO pain control reducing risk of long-term pain medication and narcotic use is of considerable importance. Acupuncture is a common medical procedure shown to alleviate PO pain. Some benefits are that it is nonpharmacologic, easy to administer, and safe. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of electroacupuncture (EA) on PO pain in patients undergoing PCNL. Materials and Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. The study was Institutional Review Board approved and performed under standard ethical guidelines. Fifty-one patients undergoing PCNL by a single surgeon were randomized to one of the three groups: true EA (n = 17), sham EA (SEA, n = 17), and no acupuncture (control, n = 17). The EA and SEA were performed by a single licensed acupuncturist <1 hour before operation. PCNL was performed without the use of intraoperative nerve block(s) or local anesthetic. Pain scores (visual analog scale [VAS]), narcotic use (morphine equivalents), and side effects were recorded at set intervals postoperatively. Results: Mean VAS scores for flank and abdomen pain were lower at all time periods in the EA compared with the SEA and control groups. Mean cumulative opioid usage was lower in the EA group immediately postoperatively compared with both SEA and control groups. Two patients in the EA group did not require any PO narcotics. No differences between groups were found for PO nausea and vomiting. No adverse effects of EA or SEA were noted. Conclusions: EA significantly reduced PO pain and narcotic usage without any adverse effects after PCNL. This promising treatment for managing PO pain warrants further investigation.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu