Autor: |
Brooks BL; a Neuropsychology Service , Alberta Children's Hospital , Calgary , Canada.; b Departments of Paediatrics, Clinical Neurosciences, and Psychology , University of Calgary , Calgary , Canada.; c Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute , University of Calgary , Calgary , Canada., Plourde V; d Faculty St-Jean , University of Alberta , Edmonton , Canada., Fay-McClymont TB; a Neuropsychology Service , Alberta Children's Hospital , Calgary , Canada.; c Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute , University of Calgary , Calgary , Canada.; e Department of Paediatrics , University of Calgary , Calgary , Canada., MacAllister WS; a Neuropsychology Service , Alberta Children's Hospital , Calgary , Canada.; c Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute , University of Calgary , Calgary , Canada.; e Department of Paediatrics , University of Calgary , Calgary , Canada., Sherman EMS; f Department of Brain Health Program , Copeman Healthcare Centre , Calgary , Canada. |
Abstrakt: |
Computerized cognitive batteries, such as CNS Vital Signs (CNSVS), can provide valuable information in clinical and research settings. However, psychometric properties, especially in children and adolescents, remain relatively understudied. The aim of this study was to investigate the factor structure of CNSVS in children and adolescents with neurological diagnoses. Participants with neurological diagnoses ( N = 280) age 7-19 years were assessed as part of their clinical care at a tertiary hospital. All participants received the full CNSVS computerized cognitive battery, which contains seven subtests designed to measure attention, executive functioning, psychomotor speed, and memory. Principal components analyses were used to examine factor structure. Scores from CNSVS subtests loaded onto a three-component solution and accounted for 46% of the variance. The three components were deemed to best represent (1) speed, (2) memory, and (3) inhibition, with subtest scores loading differently than the original 11 primary and secondary domain scores would have suggested. Although the CNSVS program generates numerous primary and secondary domain scores, a three-component solution represents a more parsimonious approach to interpreting performance on the CNSVS in youth with neurological diagnoses. Confirmation of this factor solution in other samples is warranted. |