[CONTRIBUTION OF CONVENTIONAL CHEST/ABDOMINAL PLAIN FILMS FOR THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS IN PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUS ABDOMINAL SURGERIES, WHO HAVE SUSPECTED GASTROINTESTINAL PERFORATION].

Autor:	Hameiri G; The Surgical Division, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel., Salman M; Surgery Department, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel., Daskal Y; The Surgical Division, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel., Olsha O; Surgery Department, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel., Dudkiewicz M; Management, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel., Kessel B; The Surgical Division, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel.; Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, The Technion, Haifa, Israel.
Jazyk:	hebrejština
Zdroj:	Harefuah [Harefuah] 2019 Jan; Vol. 158 (1), pp. 21-24.
Abstrakt:	Introduction: Gastrointestinal perforation is a well-known phenomenon among patients presented to emergency rooms. Common causes for perforation are gastric and duodenal ulcers, colon tumors and trauma. Some patients are operated on immediately due to the clear clinical picture of acute abdomen. The most accurate imaging is the abdominal CT scan. Conventional X-rays remain the first choice in the case of GI tract perforations. Our clinical observation is that in many cases X-ray studies are not sufficient for the decision-making process in patients with previous abdominal surgeries. Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of X-rays on the decision-making process in patients with previous abdominal surgery. Methods: A retrospective evaluation was conducted of chest/abdominal X-rays, computed tomography findings and the surgeries reports of patients admitted due to GI perforation. Results: The study population of 69 patients was divided into two groups. In group 1: patients without previous abdominal surgery, X-rays of 27 patients (69.2%) were found positive for free air. In group 2: patients with previous abdominal surgeries, 16 patients demonstrated free air on chest/abdominal X-rays. The sensitivity in group 2 (53.3%) was found significantly lower compared to group 1 (69.2 %). The difference between the groups was not statistically significant; 19 of 30 (63.3%) patients with previous abdominal operations needed abdominal CT scan before final surgical decision in comparison to 38.5% of the patients without previous abdominal operations. Conclusions: Based on these results we recommend not routinely performing X-rays in patients with previous abdominal surgery. Urgent computed tomography should be the first imaging modality. Discussion: In patients with previous abdominal surgeries, free air is visible only in half the patients in routine X-ray imaging. A significant number of those patients needed abdominal CT scan. Our study demonstrated that chest and abdominal plain radiography films are insufficient for the decision-making process in patients with previous abdominal operations. A multi-center prospective study is required in order to validate our findings.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu