Promises and perils of gene drives: Navigating the communication of complex, post-normal science.
Autor: | Brossard D; Department of Life Sciences Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706; dbrossard@wisc.edu.; Morgridge Institute for Research, Madison, WI 53715., Belluck P; The New York Times, New York, NY 10018., Gould F; Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.; Genetic Engineering and Society Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695., Wirz CD; Department of Life Sciences Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America [Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A] 2019 Apr 16; Vol. 116 (16), pp. 7692-7697. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jan 14. |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1805874115 |
Abstrakt: | In November of 2017, an interdisciplinary panel discussed the complexities of gene drive applications as part of the third Sackler Colloquium on "The Science of Science Communication." The panel brought together a social scientist, life scientist, and journalist to discuss the issue from each of their unique perspectives. This paper builds on the ideas and conversations from the session to provide a more nuanced discussion about the context surrounding responsible communication and decision-making for cases of post-normal science. Deciding to use gene drives to control and suppress pests will involve more than a technical assessment of the risks involved, and responsible decision-making regarding their use will require concerted efforts from multiple actors. We provide a review of gene drives and their potential applications, as well as the role of journalists in communicating the extent of uncertainties around specific projects. We also discuss the roles of public opinion and online environments in public engagement with scientific processes. We conclude with specific recommendations about how to address current challenges and foster more effective communication and decision-making for complex, post-normal issues, such as gene drives. Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |