Autor: |
Islam MR; Dr Muhammad Rafiqul Islam, Junior Consultant, Department of Ophthalmology, Mymensingh Medical College Hospital (MMCH), Mymensingh, Bangladesh., Wadud SA, Akhanda AH, Rahman MS, Habibullah M, Kabir MS, Rahman MH, Motaleb MA, Islam MM, Haque M, Chowdhury FQ |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Zdroj: |
Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ [Mymensingh Med J] 2018 Oct; Vol. 27 (4), pp. 673-678. |
Abstrakt: |
Nasolacrimal duct obstruction due to chronic dacryocystitis is the most common cause of epiphora. Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is the treatment of choice for chronic dacryocystitis. This can be carried out by external, endoscopic and endolaser surgical approach. Though external DCR is still a gold standard and most popular method, the latest procedure of less traumatic DCR is transcanalicular approach. The study was done to evaluate the outcome of Transcanalicular Endolaser DCR regarding epiphora and surgery related complications by measuring anatomical success rate (patency assessed by irrigation), functional success rate (symptom free) and complication rate and to compare with External DCR (Ext-DCR). This prospective interventional study was conducted from October 2011 to September 2012 in Ophthalmology department of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh. Total 62 patients included in the study as per inclusion and exclusion criteria of them 31 for TCEL-DCR and 31 for Ext-DCR. But during follow-up one patient was dropped from each group and finally outcome of 30 patients analyzed in each group. Mean age of the patients TCEL-DCR was 38.3±11.54 and of Ext-DCR was 38.4±14.01. In both groups females were the most sufferer (female: male = 1.5: 1). Functional and anatomical success rate of TCEL-DCR showed 93.3% and 83.3% after 3 months; 83.3% and 76.7% after 6 months respectively. Statistically non-significant difference was observed about success rate in comparison between groups. Per-operative complications were pain excessive bleeding. In TCEL-DCR pain complained 13.3% and excessive bleeding occurred in 3.3%. Where as in Ext-DCR pain complained 16.7% and excessive bleeding occurred in 20%; difference was statistically significant (p=0.001). Post-operative complications were bleeding and scar formation. Bleeding occurred in TCEL-DCR 6.67% and in Ext-DCR 10%. So, TCEL-DCR could be an alternative option for the treatment of chronic dacryocystitis especially for those patients who are conscious about scar formation and afraid about Ext-DCR technique. |
Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |
|