Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Acute Cholecystitis-Predictors of Recurrence and Interval Cholecystectomy.

Autor: Bhatt MN; Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: maunil.bhatt@bmc.org., Ghio M; Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts., Sadri L; Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts., Sarkar S; Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts., Kasotakis G; Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts., Narsule C; Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts., Sarkar B; Department of Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: The Journal of surgical research [J Surg Res] 2018 Dec; Vol. 232, pp. 539-546. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Aug 03.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.051
Abstrakt: Background: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) tube is a preferred option in acute cholecystitis for patients who are high risk for cholecystectomy (CCY). There are no evidence-based guidelines for patient care after PC. We identified the predictors of disease recurrence and successful interval CCY.
Methods: A retrospective review of 145 PC patients between 2008 and 2016 at a tertiary hospital was performed. Primary outcomes included mortality, readmissions, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), disease recurrence, and interval CCY.
Results: There were 96 (67%) calculous and 47 (33%) acalculous cholecystitis cases. Seventy-two (49%) had chronic and 73 (51%) had acute prohibitive risks as an indication for PC. There were 54 (37%) periprocedural complications, which most commonly were dislodgements. Twenty-six (18%) patients had a recurrence at a median time of 65 days. Calculous cholecystitis (odds ratio [OR] 3.44, P = 0.038) and purulence in the gallbladder (OR 3.77, P = 0.009) were predictors for recurrence. Forty-one (28%) patients underwent interval CCY. Patients with acute illness were likely to undergo interval CCY (OR 6.67, P = 0.0002). Patients with acalculous cholecystitis had longer hospital LOS (16 versus 8 days) and intensive care unit LOS (2 versus 0 days), and higher readmission rates (OR 2.42, P = 0.02). Thirty-day mortality after PC placement was 9%. Patients receiving interval CCY were noted to have increased survival compared to PC alone. However, this should not be attributed to interval CCY alone in absence of randomization in this study.
Conclusions: Calculous cholecystitis and purulence in the gallbladder are independent predictors of acute cholecystitis recurrence. Acute illness is a strong predictor of successful interval CCY. The association of interval CCY and prolonged survival in patients with PC as noted in this study should be further assessed in future prospective randomized trials.
(Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: