Autor: |
Behrens B; Emotion and Development Branch, The National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. brigid.behrens@nih.gov., Swetlitz C; Emotion and Development Branch, The National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA., Pine DS; Emotion and Development Branch, The National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA., Pagliaccio D; Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, 10032, USA. |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Zdroj: |
Child psychiatry and human development [Child Psychiatry Hum Dev] 2019 Jun; Vol. 50 (3), pp. 473-482. |
DOI: |
10.1007/s10578-018-0854-0 |
Abstrakt: |
The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) is a measure widely used to assess childhood anxiety based on parent and child report. However, while the SCARED is a reliable, valid, and sensitive measure to screen for pediatric anxiety disorders, informant discrepancy can pose clinical and research challenges. The present study assesses informant discrepancy, measurement invariance, test-retest reliability, and external validity of the SCARED in 1092 anxious and healthy parent-child dyads. Our findings indicate that discrepancy does not vary systematically by the various clinical, demographic, and familial variables examined. There was support for strict measurement invariance, strong test-retest reliability, and adequate external validity with a clinician-rated measure of anxiety. These findings further support the utility of the SCARED in clinical and research settings, but low parent-child agreement highlights the need for further investigation of factors contributing to SCARED informant discrepancy. |
Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |
|
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje |
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
|