Evaluating the effect of electronic monitoring and feedback on hand cream use in healthcare workers: Healthy Hands Project.

Autor: Soltanipoor M; Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Rustemeyer T; Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Sluiter JK; Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Hines J; Department of R&D, SC Johnson Professional Ltd, Denby, UK., Frison F; Clinical Unit of Occupational Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy., Kezic S; Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Contact dermatitis [Contact Dermatitis] 2019 Jan; Vol. 80 (1), pp. 26-34. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Nov 13.
DOI: 10.1111/cod.13148
Abstrakt: Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at high risk of developing hand dermatitis (HD). Current guidelines on HD prevention recommend the use of emollients; however, in practice, adherence is poor.
Objective: To assess whether the provision of creams, electronic monitoring and feedback on cream consumption can improve skin care in HCWs.
Methods: A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted on 19 academic hospital wards, including 501 HCWs, for 12 months. The intervention wards (n = 9; 285 HCWs) were provided with hand cream dispensers equipped with an electronic system to monitor use, which was regularly communicated to the HCWs by the use of posters. The process outcomes were self-reported cream consumption in both groups, and electronically measured consumption per ward in the intervention group (IG) vs the control group (CG).
Results: Self-reported cream use at follow-up was significantly higher in the IG than in the CG, before (odds ratio [OR] 2.27; 95%CI: 1.29-3.97; P = 0.004) and during (OR 3.30; 95%CI: 1.80-6.06, P < 0.001) the shift, whereas at baseline there was no difference between the groups. In the IG, electronically measured cream use was, on average, 0.4 events per shift per HCW.
Conclusion: The intervention improved hand cream use, and may therefore be considered as a practical strategy to promote skin care in HCWs. Notwithstanding this, the application frequency remained lower than recommended in the present study and current guidelines.
(© 2018 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje