Analysis of mutational signatures in primary and metastatic endometrial cancer reveals distinct patterns of DNA repair defects and shifts during tumor progression.
Autor: | Ashley CW; Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA., Da Cruz Paula A; Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA., Kumar R; Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA., Mandelker D; Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA., Pei X; Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA., Riaz N; Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA., Reis-Filho JS; Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA., Weigelt B; Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: weigeltb@mskcc.org. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Gynecologic oncology [Gynecol Oncol] 2019 Jan; Vol. 152 (1), pp. 11-19. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Nov 08. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.032 |
Abstrakt: | Objective: Mutational signatures provide insights into the biological processes shaping tumor genomes and may inform patient therapy. We sought to define the mutational signatures of i) endometrioid and serous endometrial carcinomas (ECs), stratified into the four molecular subtypes, ii) uterine carcinosarcomas, and iii) matched primary and metastatic ECs. Methods: Whole-exome sequencing MC3 data from primary endometrioid and serous carcinomas (n = 232) and uterine carcinosarcomas (n = 57) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and matched primary and metastatic ECs (n = 61, 26 patients) were reanalyzed, subjected to mutational signature analysis using deconstructSigs, and correlated with clinicopathologic and genomic data. Results: POLE (ultramutated) and MSI (hypermutated) molecular subtypes displayed dominant mutational signatures associated with POLE mutations (15/17 cases) and microsatellite instability (55/65 cases), respectively. Most endometrioid and serous carcinomas of copy-number low (endometrioid) and copy-number high (serous-like) molecular subtypes, and carcinosarcomas displayed a dominant aging-associated signature 1. Only 15% (9/60) of copy-number high (serous-like) ECs had a dominant signature 3 (homologous recombination DNA repair deficiency (HRD)-related), a prevalence significantly lower than that found in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (54%, p < 0.001) or basal-like breast cancers (46%, p < 0.001). Shifts from aging- or POLE- to MSI-related mutational processes were observed in the progression from primary to metastatic ECs in a subset of cases. Conclusions: The mutational processes underpinning ECs vary even among tumors of the same TCGA molecular subtype and in the progression from primary to metastatic ECs. Only a minority of copy-number high (serous-like) ECs display genomics features of HRD and would likely benefit from HRD-directed therapies. (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |