| Autor: |
Stadnyk AMJ; School of Physical Education, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand., Rehrer NJ; School of Physical Education, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand., Handcock PJ; School of Physical Education, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand., Meredith-Jones KA; Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand., Cotter JD; School of Physical Education, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Temperature (Austin, Tex.) [Temperature (Austin)] 2017 Dec 07; Vol. 5 (2), pp. 175-183. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Dec 07 (Print Publication: 2018). |
| DOI: |
10.1080/23328940.2017.1391366 |
| Abstrakt: |
Heat is a major stressor during exercise, though its value in driving adaptation is not well understood. Muscle heating can upregulate pathways facilitating protein synthesis and could thereby enhance effects of exercise training, however, few studies have investigated this possibility. We examined whether heating active muscle during resistance training differentially affected physical and functional adaptations. Within a randomised contralateral-limb control study, ten healthy, resistance-untrained individuals (21 ± 3 y; 5 female) completed 30 sessions of progressive resistance training (12 weeks), performing 4 × 8 unilateral knee extensions at 70% of 1RM. One randomly-allocated thigh was heated during, and for 20 min after, each session using an electric pad eliciting muscle temperatures of >38 °C (HOT); the contralateral limb remained unheated (CON). Training intensity was progressed using 4-weekly strength assessments. Quadricep lean mass (measured using DXA) increased by 15 ± 7% in HOT ( p = 0.00) and 15 ± 6% in CON ( p = 0.00); the difference being trivial ( p = 0.94). Peak isokinetic torque at 90°.s -1 increased by 30 ± 25% (HOT; p = 0.00) and 34 ± 33% (CON; p = 0.01), with no difference ( p = 0.84) between limbs. Rate of torque development increased ∼40%, with no difference between limbs ( p = 0.73). The increase in 3-RM strength was also similar in HOT (75 ± 16%) and CON (71 ± 14%; p = 0.80 for difference). No differences in mass or strength changes were evident between sexes. In conclusion, supplemental heating of active muscle during and after each bout of resistance training showed no clear positive (or negative) effect on training-induced hypertrophy or function. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
|
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje |
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
|
