Clinical evaluation of self-adhering flowable composite versus conventional flowable composite in conservative Class I cavities: Randomized controlled trial.
| Autor: | Shaalan OO; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt., Abou-Auf E; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt., El Zoghby AF; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD [J Conserv Dent] 2018 Sep-Oct; Vol. 21 (5), pp. 485-490. |
| DOI: | 10.4103/JCD.JCD_210_18 |
| Abstrakt: | Background: Self-adhering flowable composite (SAFC) minimized the time-consuming application procedures encountered with the traditional adhesive systems and restorative materials. Self-adhering composite combines the merits of both adhesive and restorative material technologies (8 th generation) in a single product, bringing new horizons, and ambitions to restorative procedures. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of SAFC compared to conventional flowable composite in conservative Class I cavities. Materials and Methods: In a split-mouth design, after cavity preparation, 18 patients with conservative Class I cavities received randomly two pairs of restorations, either Vertise™ flow or Filtek™ Z350 XT Flowable combined with Scotchbond™ Universal Etchant and Single Bond Universal, all materials were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions. Restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months by two calibrated assessors using the modified United States Public Health Service criteria measuring (retention, postoperative hypersensitivity, color match, marginal adaptation, and marginal discoloration). Statistical Analysis: Chi-square test was used to compare between flowable composite materials after different follow-up periods, Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to explore changes over follow-up periods. A value of P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: At baseline and 6 months, there was no statistically significant difference between both materials for all tested outcomes. Conclusions: SAFC has shown clinical performance similar to conventional flowable composite after 6 months of clinical service. Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest. |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|