Surface morphological and physical characterizations of glass ionomer cements after sterilization processes.

Autor: de Sousa-Lima RX; Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil., de Lima JFM; Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil., Silva de Azevedo LJ; Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil., de Freitas Chaves LV; Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil., Alonso RCB; Department of biomaterials, Universidade Anhanguera (UNIAN), São Paulo, Brazil., Borges BCD; Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Microscopy research and technique [Microsc Res Tech] 2018 Oct; Vol. 81 (10), pp. 1208-1213. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Sep 20.
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.23119
Abstrakt: The aim of this study was to investigate if sterilization methods would promote changes in the selected adhesion-related surface properties of glass ionomer cements (GICs). Riva self-cure (RSC) and Riva light-cure (RLC) GICs were tested. Thirty samples were prepared according to the type of material (RSC and RLC) and sterilization method: hydrogen peroxide gas plasma (HPGP), steam sterilization (SS), and no sterilization (n = 5 per group). A Teflon matrix (5 × 2 mm) was filled with one of the GICs to produce the samples. For the groups with the RLC material, the samples were light cured using a light curing unit for 20 s. After 24 hr, finishing and polishing were performed in all samples and then they were sterilized. Surface roughness, wettability, and micromorphology were accessed using a profilometer, a goniometer, and a scanning electron microscopy, respectively. Data were statistically analyzed through a two-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test (p < .05). Both sterilization methods promoted similar roughness values to the nonsterilized samples (p > .05). HPGP decreased contact angle for RSC (p < .01), and SS increased contact angle for RLC (p < .01). Samples subjected to HPGP presented similar surface micromorphology to nonsterilized ones, regardless of the material. SS promoted exposition of smaller filler particles in both materials. Although sterilization methods did not alter surface roughness and wettability, the sterilization methods selectively altered the micromorphology of the materials tested. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: This study's main finding suggests that each sterilization method altered the surface of glass ionomers in different ways. Thus, the choice of sterilization methods prior to bacterial adhesion can lead to a bias in antimicrobial studies.
(© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: