The reasonable drainage option after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the treatment of choledocholithiasis.

Autor: Xiao LK; Department of hepatobiliary surgery, Chongqing general hospital, 400013 Chongqing, People's Republic of China., Xiang JF; Department of hepatobiliary surgery, Chongqing general hospital, 400013 Chongqing, People's Republic of China., Wu K; Department of hepatobiliary surgery, Chongqing general hospital, 400013 Chongqing, People's Republic of China., Fu X; Department of hepatobiliary surgery, Chongqing general hospital, 400013 Chongqing, People's Republic of China., Zheng MY; Department of hepatobiliary surgery, Chongqing general hospital, 400013 Chongqing, People's Republic of China., Song XX; Department of hepatobiliary surgery, Chongqing general hospital, 400013 Chongqing, People's Republic of China., Xie W; Department of hepatobiliary surgery, Chongqing general hospital, 400013 Chongqing, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: 814580915@qq.com.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology [Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol] 2018 Dec; Vol. 42 (6), pp. 564-569. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Aug 23.
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2018.07.005
Abstrakt: Objective: To obtain a reasonable drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for the treatment of choledocholithiasis.
Methods: Data of 350 consecutive patients who underwent LCBDE in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients were divided into three groups according to different drainage types after LCBDE, including T-tube group with 116 cases, primary closure (PC) group with 114 cases and stent insertion group with 120 cases. Operative parameters and outcomes were compared.
Results: The operative time was no significant difference between the T-tube group (106.71 ± 5.19 min), PC group (105.46 ± 5.77 min) and stent insertion group (106.88 ± 5.91 min) (F = 2.175, P = 0.115). The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the stent insertion group (5.62 ± 0.70 d) than in the T-tube group (7.79 ± 0.85 d) and PC group (7.60 ± 0.80 d) (F = 279.649, P = 0.000). The hospitalization cost was significantly less in the stent insertion group (19,432.78 ± 661.74 yuan) than in the T-tube group (22,059.90 ± 697.98 yuan) and PC group (21,927.20 ± 772.02 yuan) (F = 512.492, P = 0.000). The incidence of postoperative biliary-specific complications was 2.59% (3/116 cases) in the T-tube group, 2.63% (3/114 cases) in the PC group, and 0% (0/120 cases) in the stent insertion group, but this difference was not statistically significant (χ 2  = 3.177, P = 0.204). The return to normal levels of postoperative liver function tests (LFTs) was significantly faster in the stent insertion group and T-tube group than in the PC group (P < 0.05). The number of 314 patients were followed up for a median time of 20 months (range from 1-48 months), and no biliary stricture, cholangitis or stone recurrence occurred in these patients during that time.
Conclusions: Stent insertion shows better results when compared with T-tube drainage and primary duct closure in terms of postoperative hospital stay and hospitalization cost. It is the prior option for the choledochotomy closure after LCBDE in suitable patients.
(Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: