Histology of NeoMTA Plus and Quick-Set2 in Contact with Pulp and Periradicular Tissues in a Canine Model.

Autor:	Walsh RM; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Center for Craniofacial Research and Diagnosis, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, Texas. Electronic address: ryan.walsh.dds@gmail.com., Woodmansey KF; Center for Advanced Dental Education, St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri., He J; Endodontics, Center for Craniofacial Research and Diagnosis, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, Texas., Svoboda KK; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Center for Craniofacial Research and Diagnosis, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, Texas., Primus CM; Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, School of Dental Medicine, Bradenton, Florida., Opperman LA; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Center for Craniofacial Research and Diagnosis, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, Texas.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of endodontics [J Endod] 2018 Sep; Vol. 44 (9), pp. 1389-1395.
DOI:	10.1016/j.joen.2018.05.001
Abstrakt:	Introduction: NeoMTA Plus (Avalon Biomed Inc, Bradenton, FL) is a tricalcium silicate material similar to the first mineral trioxide aggregate product, ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Sirona, York, PA), but with improvements such as decreased setting time, increased ion release, increased water sorption, and nonstaining radiopacifiers. Quick-Set2 (Avalon Biomed Inc) is a newly formulated calcium aluminosilicate material that has a faster setting time and increased acid resistance and is nonstaining. The purpose of this study was to compare the healing of pulpal and periapical tissues in dogs after exposure to NeoMTA Plus and Quick-Set2 after pulpotomy and root-end surgery procedures. Methods: Seventy-two teeth (36 for each procedure) in 6 beagle dogs received pulpotomy or root-end surgery using either NeoMTA Plus or Quick-Set2. The dogs were sacrificed at 90 days, and the teeth and surrounding tissues were prepared for histologic evaluation. Sixty teeth were evaluated and scored histologically (29 with pulpotomies and 31 with root-end resections). Specimens were scored for inflammation, quality and thickness of dentin bridging, pulp tissue response, cementum and periodontal ligament formation, and apical bone healing. Results: Both materials displayed favorable healing at 90 days. The only significant difference was the quality of dentin bridge formation in pulpotomies using NeoMTA Plus compared with Quick-Set2. Conclusions: Quick-Set2 and NeoMTA Plus had similar effects on inflammation, pulp response, periodontal ligament and cementum formation, and apical tissue healing in dogs. NeoMTA Plus had superior dentin bridge quality compared with Quick-Set2. (Copyright © 2018 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu