Evaluation of patient safety and satisfaction in a program of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy program with expanded criteria.

Autor: Sala-Hernández A; Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España. Electronic address: asalahdez@gmail.com., Granero Castro P; Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España., Montalvá Orón E; Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España., Maupoey Ibáñez J; Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España., García-Domínguez R; Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España., Bueno Lledó J; Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España., Ibáñez Cirión JL; Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España., López Andújar R; Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España.
Jazyk: English; Spanish; Castilian
Zdroj: Cirugia espanola [Cir Esp (Engl Ed)] 2019 Jan; Vol. 97 (1), pp. 27-33. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Aug 08.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2018.06.021
Abstrakt: Introduction: The good results obtained with the implementation of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy programs have led to the expansion of the initial inclusion criteria. The main objective was to evaluate the results and the degree of satisfaction of the patients included in a program of laparoscopic cholecystectomy without admission, with expanded criteria.
Methods: Observational study of a cohort of 260 patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy between April 2013 and March 2016 in a third level hospital. We classified the patients into 2groups based on compliance with the initial inclusion criteria of the outpatient program. Group I (restrictive criteria) includes 164 patients, while in group ii (expanded criteria) we counted 96 patients. We compared the surgical time, the rate of failures in ambulatory surgery, rate of conversion, reinterventions and mortality and the satisfaction index.
Results: The overall success rate of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 92.8%. The most frequent cause of unexpected income was for medical reasons. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2groups for total surgery time, the rate of conversion to open surgery and the number of major postoperative complications Do not demostrate differences in surgical time, nor in the number of perioperative complications (major complications 1,2%), or the number of failures in ambulatory surgery, nor the number of readmissions between both groups. There was no death. 88.5% of patients completed the survey, finding no differences between both groups in the patient satisfaction index. The overall score of the process was significantly better in group ii(P=.023).
Conclusions: Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe procedure with a good acceptance by patients with expanded criteria who were included in the surgery without admission program.
(Copyright © 2018 AEC. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: