Capillary Electrophoresis (CE) vs. HPLC in the determination of asialo-Tf, a crucial marker for the reliable interpretation of questioned CDT increases.

Autor: Porpiglia NM; Unit of Forensic Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Piazzale L. A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy. Electronic address: nadia.porpiglia@univr.it., Savchuk SA; Institute Translational Medicine and Biotechnology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 2-4 Bolshaya Pirogovskaya Street, 119991 Moscow, Russia., Appolonova SA; Institute Translational Medicine and Biotechnology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 2-4 Bolshaya Pirogovskaya Street, 119991 Moscow, Russia., Bortolotti F; Unit of Forensic Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Piazzale L. A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy. Electronic address: federica.bortolotti@univr.it., Tagliaro F; Unit of Forensic Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Piazzale L. A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy; Institute Translational Medicine and Biotechnology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 2-4 Bolshaya Pirogovskaya Street, 119991 Moscow, Russia. Electronic address: franco.tagliaro@univr.it.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry [Clin Chim Acta] 2018 Nov; Vol. 486, pp. 49-53. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Jul 18.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.07.031
Abstrakt: Background and Aim: CDT is a collective biomarker including asialo- and disialo-Tf, but researchers have generally focused attention on disialo-Tf, because of its easier detectability, since asialo-Tf is typically not detectable by the current methods in abstinent individuals, social drinkers and in many alcohol abusers with moderate CDT increases. In the search of a confirmation marker of alcohol-related CDT increases, the detectability of asialo-Tf was re-evaluated comparatively by using CE vs. HPLC.
Methods: 468 serum samples compulsorily drawn in a forensic/administrative context were analyzed by CE and HPLC to compare their sensitivity towards asialo-Tf.
Results: CE allowed the identification of asialo-Tf in 108 out of 165 CDT "positive" cases, based on disialo-Tf measurement (cut-off 1.8%). HPLC showed a detectable asialo-Tf peak only in 2 cases. In addition, in some cases of disputed CDT increases, the quasi-absence of this Tf component in front of an important increase of disialo-Tf allowed the ruling out of a diagnosis of alcohol abuse, in agreement with all other clinical and laboratory data.
Conclusions: The present work shows a superior performance of CE vs. HPLC for the determination of asialo-Tf and the importance of this CDT component to avoid misinterpretation of non-alcohol related CDT increases.
(Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE