Total intravenous versus inhaled anesthesia in transsphenoidal tumor surgery.

Autor: Gollapudy S; Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA., Poetker DM; Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA., Sidhu J; Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA., Riess ML; Anesthesiology, TVHS VA Medical Center, 1310 24th Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37212, USA; Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. Electronic address: matthias.riess@va.gov.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: American journal of otolaryngology [Am J Otolaryngol] 2018 Sep - Oct; Vol. 39 (5), pp. 567-569. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Jul 05.
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.06.018
Abstrakt: Purpose: Visualization of the surgical field is essential for patient safety during endoscopic transsphenoidal tumor surgery. In this retrospective chart review and data analysis of patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of pituitary tumors under general anesthesia we sought to determine if total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil leads to decreased bleeding, surgical duration, time to extubation and/or length of stay in the recovery room compared to inhaled anesthesia with sevoflurane or desflurane.
Methods: After IRB approval, chart reviews of 193 American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 to 3 patients were conducted who had undergone transsphenoidal, endonasal resections of pituitary tumors under total intravenous or inhaled anesthesia at an academic teaching hospital in the United States over a seven-year time period. One hundred four patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were further reviewed. Primary outcome was intraoperative blood loss; secondary outcomes were surgical duration, time to extubation and length of stay in the recovery room.
Results: Gender, age, and Lund-Mackay-Scores were equally distributed between the two anesthetic groups. We found no significant effect of the anesthetic technique, age, gender, or Lund Mackay score on any of the primary or secondary outcomes. The only significant predictor for recovery room length of stay was intraoperative blood loss.
Conclusion: Our study shows no evidence that total intravenous anesthesia is superior to inhaled anesthesia or vice versa during endoscopic transsphenoidal sinus surgery with regard to relevant clinical outcome parameters.
(Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: