Comparison of Outcomes in DeBakey Type AI Versus AII Aortic Dissection.

Autor: Kohl LP; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation at Abbott-Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota., Isselbacher EM; Thoracic Aortic Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts., Majahalme N; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan., Evangelista A; Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital General Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain., Russo MJ; Department of Surgery, Barnabas Heart Hospital at Newark Beth Israel, West Orange, New Jersey., Hutchison S; Departments of Cardiac Sciences, Medicine, and Radiology, University of Calgary Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada., Bossone E; Cardiology Division, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy., Suzuki T; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom., Pyeritz RE; Departments of Medicine and Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania., Gleason TG; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania., Conklin LD; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia., Montgomery DG; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan., Nienaber CA; Cardiology and Aortic Centre, The Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom., Eagle KA; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan., Harris KM; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation at Abbott-Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Electronic address: kevin.harris@allina.com.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: The American journal of cardiology [Am J Cardiol] 2018 Aug 15; Vol. 122 (4), pp. 689-695. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Jun 30.
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.04.042
Abstrakt: The DeBakey classification divides type A acute aortic dissection (AAD) into type I and type II; the latter limited to the ascending aorta. We endeavored to examine differences in DeBakey groups in a contemporary registry. We divided 1,872 patients with noniatrogenic AAD from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection into type I (n = 1691, 90.3%) and type II (n = 181, 9.7%). Patients with type II AAD were older. On presentation, patients with type I AAD reported more back and abdominal pain and were more likely to have pulse deficit. Intramural hematoma was more frequent in type II AAD. Most patients with both types were treated surgically. Lower rates of renal failure, coma, mesenteric and limb ischemia were noted in those with type II AAD. In-hospital death was less frequent (16.6% vs 22.5%) after type II AAD, a trend that did not reach significance. There was no difference in the incidence of new dissection, rapid aortic growth, late aortic intervention or survival at 5 years. In conclusion, AAD limited to the ascending aorta (DeBakey type II) appears to be associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with dissection that extend to the aortic arch or beyond. Although fewer dissection-related complications were noted in patients presenting with type II AAD, as was a trend toward reduced in-hospital mortality, 5-year survival and descending aortic sequelae are not reduced in this contemporary report from International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection.
(Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: