Does Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Improve Limb-Length Discrepancy and Acetabular Component Positioning During Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Autor: | Bingham JS; Orthopaedic Department, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona., Spangehl MJ; Orthopaedic Department, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona., Hines JT; Orthopaedic Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota., Taunton MJ; Orthopaedic Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota., Schwartz AJ; Orthopaedic Department, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | The Journal of arthroplasty [J Arthroplasty] 2018 Sep; Vol. 33 (9), pp. 2927-2931. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 May 28. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.004 |
Abstrakt: | Background: One potential benefit of the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty is the ability to use intraoperative fluoroscopy for acetabular cup positioning and limb-length evaluation. Previous studies comparing the use of fluoroscopy with an anterior approach to a posterior approach have reported conflicting results. To our knowledge, no prior study has compared acetabular cup position and limb-length discrepancy (LLD) using a DAA with and without fluoroscopy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 298 patients who underwent direct anterior total hip arthroplasty with or without intraoperative fluoroscopy. All procedures were performed by 2 surgeons who use DAA as their primary approach. Preoperative and 6-week postoperative low anteroposterior pelvis and cross-table lateral radiographs were reviewed by 3 independent surgeons. Acetabular cup inclination, anteversion, and LLD were measured and compared. Results: Thirty-three patients were excluded for inadequate imaging, leaving 125 patients in the fluoroscopy group and 140 patients in the nonfluoroscopy group. Mean inclination, anteversion, and LLD were 39.4° (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.5°-40.2°), 30.2° (95% CI, 29.2°-31.2°), and 1.1 mm (95% CI, 0.1 mm-2.2 mm) for the fluoroscopy group and 39.9° (95% CI, 39.3°-40.5°), 31.1° (95% CI, 30.0°-32.2°), and 0.8 mm (95% CI, -0.1 mm to 1.6 mm) for the nonfluoroscopy group. There was no significant difference in acetabular inclination (P = .35), anteversion (P = .22), or postoperative LLD (P = .64) between groups. Conclusion: This study found no clinically or statistically significant difference in acetabular inclination, anteversion, or LLD between the fluoroscopy and nonfluoroscopy groups. Both surgeons achieved a similar mean acetabular cup position and an equivalent mean LLD. (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |