Fluid therapy in the emergency department: an expert practice review.
| Autor: | Harris T; Academic Department Emergency Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.; Barts Health NHS Trust, Leicester, UK., Coats TJ; Emergency Medicine Academic Group, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK., Elwan MH; Emergency Medicine Academic Group, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.; Department of Emergency Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Emergency medicine journal : EMJ [Emerg Med J] 2018 Aug; Vol. 35 (8), pp. 511-515. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 May 28. |
| DOI: | 10.1136/emermed-2017-207245 |
| Abstrakt: | Intravenous fluid therapy is one of the most common therapeutic interventions performed in the ED and is a long-established treatment. The potential benefits of fluid therapy were initially described by Dr W B O'Shaughnessy in 1831 and first administered to an elderly woman with cholera by Dr Thomas Latta in 1832, with a marked initial clinical response. However, it was not until the end of the 19th century that medicine had gained understanding of infection risk that practice became safer and that the practice gained acceptance. The majority of fluid research has been performed on patients with critical illness, most commonly sepsis as this accounts for around two-thirds of shocked patients treated in the ED. However, there are few data to guide clinicians on fluid therapy choices in the non-critically unwell, by far our largest patient group. In this paper, we will discuss the best evidence and controversies for fluid therapy in medically ill patients. Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared. (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|