Evaluating the quality of the processes of care and clinical outcomes of premature newborns admitted to neonatal intensive care units in Mexico.

Autor:	Doubova SV; Epidemiology and Health Services Research Unit CMN Siglo XXI, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico City, Mexico., Josefa-García H; Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Neonatales del Hospital de Pediatría del CMN Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico., Coronado-Zarco IA; Departamento de Alojamiento Conjunto, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City, Mexico., Carrera-Muiños S; Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Neonatales, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City, Mexico., Cordero-Gonzalez G; Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Neonatales, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City, Mexico., Cruz-Reynoso L; División de pediatría, Hospital Gineco Obstetrica No 3 CMN 'LA RAZA', Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico., Mateos-Sanchez L; Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Neonatales, Hospital de Gineco Obstetricia No. 4, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico., Maya-García AJ; Epidemiology and Health Services Research Unit CMN Siglo XXI, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico City, Mexico., Pérez-Cuevas R; Health System Research Center, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca City, Mexico.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care [Int J Qual Health Care] 2018 Oct 01; Vol. 30 (8), pp. 608-617.
DOI:	10.1093/intqhc/mzy061
Abstrakt:	Objectives: To develop quality of care (QoC) indicators, evaluate the quality of the processes of care (QPC) and clinical outcomes, and analyze the association between the QPC and severe clinical outcomes of preterm newborns admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Design: Mixed methods approach: (1) development of QoC indicators via modified RAND/UCLA method; (2) cross-sectional study of QoC evaluation and (3) multiple logistic regression analysis to ascertain the association between the QPC and severe clinical outcomes. Setting: Two NICUs belonged to the Mexican Institute of Social Security in Mexico City. Participants: About 489 preterm neonates (<37 weeks of gestation) without severe congenital anomalies. Main Outcome Measure(s): The QoC indicators; ≥60% of recommended QPC and severe clinical outcomes. Results: The QoC included 10 QPC indicators across four domains: respiratory, nutrition and metabolism, infectious diseases, and screening, and five outcome indicators. The lower QPC indicators were for the nutrition and metabolism domain (17.8% started enteral feeding with human milk, and 20.7% received sodium bicarbonate appropriately). The higher QPC indicator was for the screening domain (97.6% of neonates <30 weeks gestation underwent early (≤14 days) transfontanelar ultrasound). The mean recommended QPC that neonates received was 47.5%. Only 26.6% of neonates received ≥60% of recommended QPC. About 60.7% of neonates developed severe clinical outcomes including mortality and healthcare-related major morbidity. Receiving ≥60% of recommended QPC was associated with a decrease of nearly half of odds of severe clinical outcomes. Conclusion: The evaluation of the QoC in NICUs is essential to address modifiable gaps in quality.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu