[Comparison of cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bending and pressing the lower extremities with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a prospective multicenter trial].

Autor:	Li X; Department of Intensive Care Unit, Lu'an Civily Hospital, Lu'an 237002, Anhui, China (Li X, Zhou TH, Huang H); Trauma, Emergency and Intensive Care Medical Center, the 5th People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai 200240, China (Liu JJ, Tang JG); Department of Emergency and Intensive Care Unit, the First People's Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200080, China (Tian R, Wang RL); Department of Emergency, Shanghai Hudong Hospital, Shanghai 200129, China (Wang LY). Corresponding author: Li Xiang, Email: lix96@126.com., Liu J, Tian R, Tang J, Wang R, Wang L, Zhou T, Huang H
Jazyk:	čínština
Zdroj:	Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue [Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue] 2018 Apr; Vol. 30 (4), pp. 360-364.
DOI:	10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.04.015
Abstrakt:	Objective: To compare the effects of cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bending and pressing the lower extremities (BPLE-CPR) with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (S-CPR). Methods: A multicenter prospective nonrandomized controlled study was performed. Patients with cardiac arrest (CA) treated in the emergency departments and intensive care units (ICU) of seven hospitals in Eastern China from January 2013 to February 2017 were enrolled. BPLE-CPR or S-CPR was used for resuscitation according to the patient's condition. Data registration was completed in Utstein style. The primary outcome was recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate, and the secondary outcome included survival rate at discharge, the resuscitation time of ROSE patients, blood pressures during resuscitation, the survival rates within 24 hours and beyond 24 hours, and the cerebral performance categories (CPC) of discharged patients. Results: A total of 279 patients completed data registration, including 142 in the BPLE-CPR group and 137 in the S-CPR group. ROSC rate, survival rates over 24 hours and at discharge in BPLE-CPR group were significantly higher than those in S-CPR group [ROSC rate: 63.4% (90/142) vs. 29.2% (40/137), survival rate over 24 hours: 56.7% (51/90) vs. 45.0% (18/40), survival rate at discharge: 43.0% (61/142) vs. 20.4% (28/137), all P < 0.01]. The CPR duration of ROSC patients in BPLE-CPR group was significantly shorter than that in S-CPR group [minute: 10 (5, 15) vs. 20 (11, 30), P < 0.01], while systolic blood pressure during CPR was significantly higher than that in S-CPR group [mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 92.0 (80.0, 110.0) vs. 73.5 (65.5, 80.0), P < 0.01]. In survival discharged patients, the proportion of CPC 1 patients in BPLE-CPR group was significantly higher than that in S-CPR group [24.6% (15/61) vs. 10.7% (3/28), P < 0.01]. Conclusions: BPLE-CPR is superior to S-CPR in terms of ROSC rate and discharge survival rate. In addition, the BPLE-CPR procedure is simple and easy to expand in public. Clinical Test Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-TRC-13003150.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu