The impact of contrast-enhanced spectral mammogram (CESM) and three-dimensional breast ultrasound (3DUS) on the characterization of the disease extend in cancer patients.

Autor:	Helal MH; 1 Department of Radiology, Women's Imaging Unit, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University , Cairo , Egypt., Mansour SM; 2 Department of Radiology, Women's Imaging Unit, Kasr-El Ainy Hospital, Cairo University , Cairo , Egypt., Salaleldin LA; 2 Department of Radiology, Women's Imaging Unit, Kasr-El Ainy Hospital, Cairo University , Cairo , Egypt., Alkalaawy BM; 2 Department of Radiology, Women's Imaging Unit, Kasr-El Ainy Hospital, Cairo University , Cairo , Egypt., Salem DS; 2 Department of Radiology, Women's Imaging Unit, Kasr-El Ainy Hospital, Cairo University , Cairo , Egypt., Mokhtar NM
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	The British journal of radiology [Br J Radiol] 2018 Jul; Vol. 91 (1087), pp. 20170977. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 May 24.
DOI:	10.1259/bjr.20170977
Abstrakt:	Objective: The main importance of imaging breast cancer is to guide conservative surgeries. In this study, we evaluated the role of contrast-enhanced spectral mammogram (CESM) in correlation with three-dimensional (3D) breast ultrasound in characterizing the extension of the intramammary cancer in view of the: (i) the size of the main tumor, (ii) the multiplicity of the breast cancer, and (iii) the peri-tumoral stromal involvement (i.e. free or intraductal extension of the cancer). Methods: The study is a prospective analysis that included 300 breast masses proved to be malignant. The masses were evaluated for their size, multiplicity and surrounding stromal involvement. Contrast-based mammography performed with low (22-33 kVp) and high (44-49 kVp) energy exposures that were taken after i.v. injection of contrast agent and followed by bilateral 3D breast ultrasound. Operative data were the gold standard reference. Results: There was no significant difference between the sizes of the included cancers as measured by CESM and 3D ultrasound and that measured at the pathological analysis. CESM showed higher accuracy (32.7%, n = 98) than 3D ultrasound (24.7%, n = 74) in the size agreement within 5% range. CESM was the most accurate modality (94%, n = 282) in detecting tumor multiplicity, followed by traditional sonomammogram (88%, n = 264), then 3D breast ultrasound (84%, n = 252). Intraductal extension of the breast cancer was best evaluated by the 3D ultrasound with an accuracy value of 98% (n = 294) compared to only 60% (n = 180) by CESM. Conclusion: CESM is a recommended investigation in breast cancer to increase the accuracy of size measurement and the detection of multiple tumors. The addition of 3D ultrasound can enhance the detection of intraductal extension. Advances in knowledge: Choice of conservative breast surgery vs mastectomy is still a debate. We used an advanced, contrast-based, application of the mammogram: CESM and a non-invasive 3D breast ultrasound in the assessment of the local extension of the breast cancer regarding size, perifocal stromal infiltration and multiplicity to guide the selection of proper management in proved cases of breast cancer.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu