High-definition colonoscopy versus Endocuff versus EndoRings versus full-spectrum endoscopy for adenoma detection at colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized trial.

Autor: Rex DK; Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA., Repici A; Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital & Humanitas University via Manzoni, Milan, Italy., Gross SA; Department of Gastroenterology, Tisch Hospital, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA., Hassan C; Department of Gastroenterology, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy., Ponugoti PL; Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA., Garcia JR; Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA., Broadley HM; Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA., Thygesen JC; Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA., Sullivan AW; Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA., Tippins WW; Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA., Main SA; Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA., Eckert GJ; Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA., Vemulapalli KC; Department of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, St. George's University, Grenada, West Indies.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Gastrointestinal endoscopy [Gastrointest Endosc] 2018 Aug; Vol. 88 (2), pp. 335-344.e2. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Mar 09.
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.02.043
Abstrakt: Background and Aims: Devices used to improve polyp detection during colonoscopy have seldom been compared with each other.
Methods: We performed a 3-center prospective randomized trial comparing high-definition (HD) forward-viewing colonoscopy alone to HD with Endocuff to HD with EndoRings to the full spectrum endoscopy (FUSE) system. Patients were age ≥50 years and had routine indications and intact colons. The study colonoscopists were all proven high-level detectors. The primary endpoint was adenomas per colonoscopy (APC).
Results: Among 1188 patients who completed the study, APC with Endocuff (APC mean ± standard deviation: 1.82 ± 2.58), EndoRings (1.55 ± 2.42), and standard HD colonoscopy (1.53 ± 2.33) were all higher than FUSE (1.30 ± 1.96; P < .001 for APC). The APC for Endocuff was higher than standard HD colonoscopy (P = .014). Mean cecal insertion times with FUSE (468 ± 311 seconds) and EndoRings (403 ± 263 seconds) were both longer than with Endocuff (354 ± 216 seconds; P = .006 and .018, respectively).
Conclusions: For high-level detectors at colonoscopy, forward-viewing HD instruments dominate the FUSE system, indicating that for these examiners image resolution trumps angle of view. Further, Endocuff is a dominant strategy over EndoRings and no mucosal exposure device on a forward-viewing HD colonoscope. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02345889.).
(Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: